Integral Domains
Table of Contents
1. Definition and Properties
An Integral Domain is a unital ring with no nonzero divisors, i.e., if \(ab = 0\) then either \(a=0\) or \(b=0\).
Constructive mathematicians would phrase this differently, as saying \(ab\neq0\) whenever \(a\neq0\) and \(b\neq0\).
The integers \(\ZZ\), rationals \(\QQ\), reals \(\RR\), and complex numbers are integral domains.
Let \(X\) be a non-empty set with at least 2 disjoint subsets \(X_{1}\), \(X_{2}\); and let \(R\) be any ring. Then \(\hom(X,R)\) is not an integral domain. To see this, consider
\begin{equation} f(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & x\in X_{0}\\ 0 & x\notin X_{0} \end{cases} \end{equation}and
\begin{equation} g(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & x\in X_{1}\\ 0 & x\notin X_{1}. \end{cases} \end{equation}Then we have
\begin{equation} (fg)(x) = f(x)g(x) = 0 \end{equation}since \(X_{0}\cap X_{1}=\emptyset\). Although both \(f\neq0\) and \(g\neq0\), we have \(fg=0\).
The ring \(\ZZ[\sqrt{-5}]\) is an integral domain.
1.1. Factors
Let \(R\) be an integral domain, and \(x,y\in R\). We say that \(x\) Divides \(y\), and write \(x\mid y\), if \(y=xt\) for some \(t\in R\).
We call an element \(x\in R\) a Unit if \(x\mid 1\). The set of units of \(R\) is denoted \(R^{*}\).
Calling an element \(x\in R\) a unit is a fancy-pants way of saying it has a multiplicative inverse. Every integral domain has at least one unit (indeed, all unital rings have at least one unit): the multiplicative identity \(1\in R\) is its own multiplicative inverse.
We say \(z\in R\) is a Greatest Common Divisor of \(x_{1}\), …, \(x_{n}\) and write \(z=\gcd(x_{1},\dots, x_{n})\) if
- \(z\mid x_{j}\) for \(1\leq j\leq n\)
- for any \(t\in R\), \(t\mid x_{j}\) for \(1\leq j\leq n\) implies \(t\mid z\).
Further, stealing borrowing terminology from number theory, we say
that \(x\) and \(y\) are Coprime if there exists a unit \(u\in R^{*}\)
which is a gcd of \(x\) and \(y\).
Let \(R\) be an integral domain, and \(x,y\in R\). If \(z\) and \(t\) are both GCDs of \(x\) and \(y\), then there exists a \(u\in R\) such that \(z=ut\).
- Assume \(z = \gcd(x,y)\), \(t=\gcd(x,y)\), and \(t\neq z\).
- Then \(t\mid x\) and \(t\mid y\) by definition of gcd.
- Then \(t\mid z\) by \(z=\gcd(x,y)\).
- Thus \(z=ut\) for some \(u\in R\).
(Bronstein, 1.1.1) Let \(R\) be an integral domain, and \(x,y\in R\). If \(z\) and \(t\) are both GCDs of \(x\) and \(y\), then \(z=ut\) and \(t=vz\) for some units \(u,v\in R^{*}\).
- Assume \(z = \gcd(x,y)\), \(t=\gcd(x,y)\), and \(t\neq z\).
- Consider \(u\in R\) such that \(z=ut\) by the previous lemma.
- Consider \(v\in R\) such that \(t=vz\) by the previous lemma.
- Then \(z=ut=u(vz)\).
- If \(z\neq0\), then \(u,v\in R^{*}\).
- If \(z=0\), then \(t=1z\) and \(z=1t\).
- Thus \(u,v\in R^{*}\).
In an integral domain \(R\), let \(a,b\in R\). If \(a\) divides \(b\), and \(b\) divides \(a\), then we call them Associates. Equivalently, if there is some unit \(u\in R^{*}\) such that \(a=ub\).
1.2. Prime, Irreducible Elements
Let \(R\) be an integral domain. A nonzero element \(p\in R\setminus R^{*}\) is called Prime if for any \(a,b\in R\), \(p\mid ab\) implies \(p\mid a\) or \(p\mid b\).
Let \(R\) be an integral domain. A nonzero element \(p\in R\setminus R^{\ast}\) is called Irreducible if for any \(a,b\in R\), \(p = ab\) implies \(a\in R^{\ast}\) or \(b\in R^{\ast}\).
Greater intuition may be derived by considering the contrapositive: \(p\) is irreducible if for any \(a,b\in R\), we have \(a\notin R^{\ast}\) and \(b\notin R^{\ast}\) implies \(p\neq ab\). That is, it can't be written as the product of two non-units.
Let \(R\) be an integral domain. Then every prime \(p\in R\) is irreducible.
- Let \(p\in R\) be prime.
- Assume \(a,b\in R\) satisfy \(p=ab\).
- Per cases \(p\mid a\) or \(p\mid b\) by definition of prime.
- Suppose \(p\mid a\);
- Then \(a=q_{a}p\);
- Thus \(1=q_{a}b\);
- Thus \(b\mid 1\);
- Thus \(b\in R^{\ast}\) is a unit.
- Suppose \(p\mid b\); then \(a\in R^{\ast}\) is a unit (by the exact same reasoning).
- Hence \(p\) is irreducible.
In any integral domain, a prime is always irreducible. The converse is not always true.
2. References
- Manuel Bronstein, Symbolic Integration 1: Transcendental Functions. Springer, second ed., 1996.