\( \newcommand\D{\mathrm{d}} \newcommand\E{\mathrm{e}} \newcommand\I{\mathrm{i}} \newcommand\bigOh{\mathcal{O}} \newcommand{\cat}[1]{\mathbf{#1}} \newcommand\curl{\vec{\nabla}\times} \newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb{C}} \newcommand{\NN}{\mathbb{N}} \newcommand{\QQ}{\mathbb{Q}} \newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\ZZ}{\mathbb{Z}} \)
UP | HOME

Differential Geometry - Mizar

Table of Contents

1. Mapping out what has been formalized

There seems to be some work done on topological manifolds, but not much on differential manifolds. So far, there does not appear to be a notion of atlases or charts (so far as I can tell, at least).

2. Topics Not Yet Formalized

However, what is lacking is…well, a bit. For example:

  • Charts and Atlases
    • This is tricky, because there are two conventions for defining a chart, and they are completely opposite of each other.
      • Convention 1: Given a manifold \(M\) we could define a chart as \(\varphi\colon U\subset M\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\) being a homeomorphism with its image. The mapping in this direction (from patch of manifold to Euclidean space) is called the local coordinate for the patch.
        • Bourbaki follows this convention, at least I infer as much from Lie Groups, III §1.1 Lemma 1 (page 210 of my paperback copy);
        • Warner's Foundations of Differential Geometry and Lie Groups (Def.1.3) follows this convention;
        • Isham's Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists follows this convention (Def.2.1 in §2.2).
        • Spivak's Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, vol. I, appears to follow this convention (for every \(x\in M\) there is a neighborhood \(U\subset M\) of \(x\in U\) which is homeomorphic to an open subset of \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) — pg 1; but also see chapter 2, where smooth structures are defined using charts following this convention)
        • If I recall correctly, both Tu and Lee follow this convention.
      • Convention 2: Given a manifold, a chart is a mapping \(\varphi\colon V\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}\to M\) which is a homeomorphism with its image. The mapping in this direction (from a patch of Euclidean space to the manifold) is called a local parametrization for the manifold.
        • Milnor follows this convention,
        • do Carmo's Riemannian Geometry uses this convention.
        • Besse's Einstein Manifolds (§1.41) appears to have a chart be from a patch of Euclidean space to the manifold.
        • When I took Dr Fuchs's course on differential topology, the convention used followed Milnor (I suspect to avoid people copying proofs from Tu, Lee, and friends).
    • Compatible charts
    • Atlas = family of pairwise compatible charts which cover the manifold
    • Equivalent atlases = the union of the atlases is another atlas
    • Two atlases are equivalent if and only if every chart from one atlas is compatible with every chart from the other atlas.
    • The relation (equivalent atlases) is transitive
    • A subset of the manifold is open (with respect to an atlas) if blah blah blah. Atlases induce a topology.
  • Mappings between manifolds
    • Embedding, Immersion, Submersion, Diffeomorphism, Local Diffeomorphism
    • Partitions of Unity
  • Products of Manifolds
    • There are other related constructions (the disjoint union of manifolds of the same dimension, and the connected sum), but I'm not sure how necessary they are to begin with…
  • Submanifolds
  • Tangent Vectors and Vector Fields
    • Tangent bundle, double tangent bundle
  • Differentials of Smooth Maps
  • Morse Theory
  • Differential Forms

Last Updated 2023-11-28 Tue 08:44.